Why do people laugh at creationists?

Thunderf00t's series answering all of the misinformation, nonsense and outright lies told by the anti-evolution lobby.

Parts 1-20

Part 1: The search for water and the Grand Canyon
Part 2: Chemical evolution, fusion and also eclipses
Part 3: The Hovind Theory (snicker)
Part 4: The Hovind Theory (continued)
Part 5: The Hovind Theory - Global flood and Ice Shield <-- you have got to see this!
Part 6: Kent Hovind and X-Rays
Part 7: More Hovind - Evolution
Part 8: Probability Calculations and "Chance" Abiogenesis
Part 9: The fallacy of requirement of a designer - Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort
Part 10: Fine Tuning
Part 11: The age of the Earth and Noah's Ark
Part 12: Kent Hovind's lack of biological understanding
Part 13: DNA
Part 14: Quote mining and other dishonest tactics
Part 15: Jonathan Wells, The Cambrian Explosion and more dishonesty from Creationists
Part 16: Creationist comedian VenomFangX
Part 17: "Information" and Creationists lack of understanding of the term
Part 18: Creationists opposition to free speech
Part 19: Deconstructing a creationist animation
Part 20: Is evolution flawed? Is the moon receding?

If someone could talk a religious person into coming in here to go thru this posting, it'd be fun.

I posted these videos on their own thread in SP and guess what? None of the evolution deniers on there (1oldminer, WesMordine, moviefan2k4, picturepaws and oracle71) actually watched any of them.

Did they even make a comment?

1oldminer tried to sabotage the thread to get it deleted (a tactic he'd tried several times before). He makes it quite clear at one point that he has seen none of them and has no intention of doing so.

http://forums.superiorpics.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/2468149#Post2468149

I personally find the "off-topic" rule over there too harsh. If people want to go off a bit on something, i'm usually fine with it. The reason i don't like that rule is that when people debate/talk in real life, they stray off topic but usually get back to the point after a bit. When it goes far off topic, then yeah, it needs correcting. We don't have a rule on this here.... yet.

But i see what you're talking about.

The_Amber_Spyglass wrote:I posted these videos on their own thread in SP and guess what? None of the evolution deniers on there (1oldminer, WesMordine, moviefan2k4, picturepaws and oracle71) actually watched any of them.

Thank you for posting these in here. I saw this in SP but, well, you know...

I haven't actually watched them yet so I will reserve judgement for now. But as far as the topic is concerned, I just find evolution fascinating. But it's more than just "evolution" - it's those things that affect how life evolves (climate, techtonics, atmospheric conditions, etc.). All that stuff has changed throughout the earth's history and as a result, the life on our planet has changed - or ceased. I find this kind of stuff fascinating.

Part 34 added today.

Parts 21-40

Part 21: VenomFangX gets suspended
Part 22: Ben Stein making a fool of himself
Part 23: More Ben Stein and his ignorance of Darwin
Part 24: More Ben Stein and Expelled
Part 25: More Jonathan Wells and Abiogenesis
Part 26: Sarah Palin
Part 27: More VenomFangX
Part 28: Science and the bible
Part 29: Morality
Part 30: Casey Luskins responds to "Challenging the Discovery Institute"
Part 31: "Bananaman" Ray Comfort lies to cover his tracks
Part 32: Kent and Eric Hovind have 4 questions
Part 33: Internet blogger Nephilimfree
Part 34: More Nephilimfree
Part 35: The Return of VenomFangX
Part 36: More on the Return of VenomFangX

I wish someone would do a series called 'Why Do People Laugh at Denialists.' You don't get to be a scpetic on this subject unless you have PhD after your name.